Audi beats BMW with bigger bonus

Audi may be No. 2 to BMW in global luxury car sales so far this year, but it's well ahead of its Bavarian rival in a very important category with workers: annual profit-sharing bonus. Audi employees are getting 6,513 euros on average for 2010 while the average payout at BMW is 5,840 euros. Much like the global ranking for premium-car sales, Daimler also is third in this area, with an average payout of 3,150 euros for 2010.
Employees whose jobs are covered under the companies' collective bargaining agreements are receiving big profit-sharing payouts because of the massive success their employers enjoyed in 2010.
The average payout given to Audi employees for 2010 beats the company's previous best of 5,307 euros on average for 2008. Audi sold a record 1,092,400 cars last year and had an operating profit of 3.3 billion euros.
At BMW, the average bonus for the 2010 fiscal year tops the previous high of 5,600 euros given for 2007, which was the year the company sold a record 1.50 million BMW, Mini and Rolls-Royce vehicles. In 2010, BMW sold 1.46 million cars and reported a record net profit of 3.2 billion euros.
Daimler's average payout for 2010 was the second highest given by the company and just a bit below the 3,750 euro bonus for 2007. The 2010 payout rewarded workers for a year when the company's net profit soared to 4.67 billion euros from a loss of 2.64 billion euros in 2009.
BMW did not give a profit-sharing payout in 2008 and 2009 due to the global financial crisis. Daimler withheld the payout in 2009 but gave employees a 500 euro "thank you" bonus for that year. Audi, meanwhile, paid a bonus without interruption. Since 2006, the average annual payout at Audi has been about 4,850 euros. (See box, below)
With all three premium automakers predicting new sales records in 2011, employees who are on the profit-sharing plan will probably be smiling again next year at about this time.
READ MORE - Audi beats BMW with bigger bonus

Ford: Debt woes cloud European outlook

LONDON (Bloomberg) -- Concern about European government spending cuts hurt car demand in the second quarter, adding to uncertainty over the recovery of the region's auto market, said Stephen Odell, the head of Ford Motor Co.'s European operations.
"The second quarter's been a bit more difficult as we start to see austerity measures kicking in and concerns about sovereign debt," Odell said in an interview in London. "It's pretty difficult to predict where the industry is going to go."
Ford projects that industry-wide sales in the region will range between 14.5 million and 15.5 million vehicles this year.
Sales in 2010 totaled 13.8 million, according to data from the European Automobile Manufacturers' Association.
Ford expects to offset the industry weakness in part with new products and should benefit from "full availability" of the C-Max minivan and Focus compact, Odell said in the interview at a conference organized by Britain's Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders.
Ford plans to beef up its factories in the U.K., investing 1.5 billion pounds ($2.4 billion) over the next five years, Odell said at the event. More than half of the funds will come from the carmaker, with European Union grants and a 340 million- pound guarantee from the U.K. making up the balance.
Ford also plans to create "several hundred" jobs in Europe this year.
Ford's market share in Europe through May slipped to 8 percent from 8.6 percent, dropping it below General Motors Co., which garnered 8.6 percent of car sales in the region, according to data from the regional trade group.
In a recent report, Standard & Poor's said the potential for profitability improvement at Ford and GM lies "primarily in Europe."
READ MORE - Ford: Debt woes cloud European outlook

Ghosn makes $11.5 million as Nissan posts record share Read more: http://www.autonews.com/#ixzz1QjJMX3tD

TOKYO (Bloomberg) -- Nissan Motor Co. CEO Carlos Ghosn received 982 million yen or $11.46 million in total compensation last fiscal year, including salary and stock options, as the Japanese carmaker captured a record market share.
Ghosn, 57, who got a 10 percent increase in the year ended March, announced his compensation at Nissan's annual shareholder meeting today. He is the highest-paid leader among Japanese companies that have disclosed executive compensation, according to Bloomberg data. He was followed by Sony Corp. Chairman Howard Stringer, who made about 863 million yen in salary, bonus and stock options, the electronics maker said Tuesday.
Ghosn's pay is lower than the average for global automotive companies, estimated at about $15.3 million by Towers Watson & Co., a U.S. benefits consultant. Ford Motor Co. CEO Alan Mulally earned the most among auto manufacturers with about $26.5 million in 2010. Publicly traded Japanese companies are required by financial regulations to disclose compensation for executives who earn more than 100 million yen.
"Western companies see the need to provide higher incentives to top management than Japanese companies do," said Takeshi Miyao, an analyst at consulting company Carnorama in Tokyo. "They understand that well-performing management leads to good earnings results and they maintain adequate pay to make sure top managers don't leave for another company."
Toyota, Honda
Toyota Motor Corp. President Akio Toyoda was paid 136 million yen in the year ended March 31, including a 24 million yen bonus, according to a filing to Japan's finance ministry last week. Honda Motor Co. President Takanobu Ito earned 130 million yen in the same period.
Toyoda's pay wasn't listed a year earlier, indicating he earned less than 100 million yen at the time. Ghosn was paid 891 million yen in the year earlier period.
Nissan's senior vice president of marketing and sales in Europe, Simon Thomas, left this month to take a job at Volkswagen AG, Ghosn said in an interview.
"Nissan is obviously targeted not just by Japanese companies, but foreign companies going after talent," Ghosn said.
Record share
Nissan, Japan's second-largest automaker, boosted global vehicle sales 19 percent to 4.185 million in the year ended March 31 as China sales surged 36 percent and North American deliveries gained 17 percent. The carmaker's global market share rose 0.3 percentage points to a record 5.8 percent.
Japanese automakers are recovering from the nation's record earthquake on March 11, which disrupted auto production. Nissan expects to resume full output worldwide by October, the fastest recovery among the nation's largest automakers.
Nissan said this month it would pay its top 14 executives and auditors an average of 126 million yen for the year ended March 31. Average pay for nine executives excluding corporate auditors rose 32 percent to 186.4 million yen, more than twice the levels at Toyota and Honda.
Nissan posted net income of 31 billion yen for the three months ended March as global vehicle sales rose 16 percent to 1.2 million. In the same period, Toyota's profit fell to the lowest in 18 months to 25 billion yen as sales declined 12 percent.
'So diverse'
Non-Japanese officials account for 44 percent, or 43 of the top 97 positions at Nissan, and four out of nine, or 44 percent, of its executive committee members, according to the automaker. The top 97 positions include Brazilian, Portuguese, British, French, Dutch, American, Indian, German, Italian, Spanish, Canadian and South African executives, Nissan said.
"There are no other automakers in the world that have this kind of diversity," Ghosn said. "Because our executive team is so diverse, for compensation, we benchmark some of the similarly diversified companies, and the reason is simple: we compete against these companies for the same pool of multicultural, highly educated and highly mobile talent."
Ghosn's total compensation was 0.3 percent of Nissan's net income for the year ended March 31, compared with an average of 1.4 percent for CEOs at S&P 500 companies, according to Equilar Inc., a California-based executive-pay researcher.
READ MORE - Ghosn makes $11.5 million as Nissan posts record share Read more: http://www.autonews.com/#ixzz1QjJMX3tD

2011 Superbike Smackdown VIII Track

 


BMW shocked the sportbike world with its S1000RR. See how it performed in this year’s shootout in the 2011 BMW S1000RR Track Shootout Video.
Two-time Superbike Smackdown champ, Honda’s CBR1000RR faces off against the competition see how it performs in the 2011 Honda CBR1000RR Track Shootout Video.


Ducati’s 1198 Superbike goes head-to-head against the world’s best liter-class sportbikes. Find out how it does in the 2011 Ducati 1198 Superbike Smackdown Comparison Video


Does Suzuki’s GSX-R1000 have what it takes to run up front in this year’s Superbike Smackdown? Find out in the 2011 Suzuki GSX-R1000 Track Shootout Video.


Kawasaki’s new ZX-10R finally faces off against the competition. Find out how it fares in the 2011 Kawasaki ZX-10R Track Shootout Video.


Watch how the KTM’s RC8R performs at the racetrack as tested in the 2011 KTM RC8R Track Shootout Video.


Yamaha offers riders a different take on the standard Inline-Four engine. Watch what it’s like to ride in the 2011 Yamaha YZF-R1 Track Shootout Video.


Michelin signs on as the Official Tire of this year’s Superbike Smackdown test. See how the tires perform in the Michelin Power One Race Tire Review Video.
In the realm of motorcycling, liter-class Superbikes are the pride and joy of every manufacturers’ line-up. These high-performance motorcycles are the apex of production sportbike design showcasing the latest race-bred technologies trickled down from both Superbike and MotoGP racing. Each brand funnels untold sums of cash into its engineering departments in a quest to deliver the lightest, fastest, most technologically advanced sportbikes for motorcyclists to ride, play on and race. Still the question remains: Which bike is the best?


Since 2004, Motorcycle USA has corralled each brand’s machine and pitted it head-to-head against its class rivals. We determine where the latest crop of Superbikes rank at the track, where sportbikes are truly meant to be ridden, as well as the street, for those who wish to enjoy the fruits of closed circuit development on the way to work. As we’ve done in the past, we divide out 2011 Superbike comparison into separate track and street reviews so everything you need to know about these bikes on the street will follow this test in a couple weeks. Right now, its all about the track.


Seven motorcycle manufactures stepped up to the plate this year including BMW, Ducati, Honda, Kawasaki, KTM, Suzuki and Yamaha. Unfortunately, Aprilia opted out, since it didn’t have ’11 RSV4 machinery available. MV Agusta, as usual, also chose not to compete.


BMW’s spectacular S1000RR returns as the reigning champ after wowing us last year with the borderline psychotic performance from its Inline-Four engine, adaptive electronics and well-engineered chassis. The big Beemer was our pick for 2010 Motorcycle of the Year and that, along with the results of last year's Smackdown makes it the benchmark. Aside from colors, price ($16,630 as tested) and an updated crankshaft engineered to meet World Superbike homologation, it’s identical to the ’10 model.


Though it’s been four-plus years since last major overhaul (a lifetime in the sportbike world), Honda’s CBR1000RR is a more than capable adversary having collected consecutive Superbike Smackdown wins in ’08 and ’09. Like the S1000RR, the CBR is virtually unchanged except for graphics and annual bump in price ($13,399 for the non-ABS version).


In the 2010 Superbike Smackdown VII Track shootout, Ducati had a fantastic platform with the up-spec 1198S Corse Special Edition Superbike. This L-Twin-powered machine mesmerized us with its superb trellis-frame and Ohlins-equipped chassis and torque-rich powerband. This time around, we’re testing the base model which 1198 which for 2011, features standard traction control as well as a quick-shifter for $16,495.


Despite Suzuki competing with a three-year old machine due to the company choosing not to import any 2010-model sportbikes into the U.S. last year because of an unfavorable economic balance sheet, the GSX-R1000 performed well. If nothing else, the GSX-R1000 showed us why it has won more Superbike Smackdown shootouts than any other model. For 2011 it wears new colors at an MSRP of $13,599.


Perhaps the most anticipated machine in this contest is Kawasaki’s new from the wheels up ZX-10R ($13,799 non-ABS version) as tested in the 2011 Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R First Ride. In a time where redesign cycles are getting longer, Kawi is swinging for the fences in hope of taking the crown and creating aplatform for a successful World Superbike effort. The pieces are all in place and the new Ninja looks great on paper. But does it have what it takes to beat the BMW?


Although KTM’s Twin-powered RC8 has been around for a few years the Austrians continue to make subtle refinements each year in hopes of perfecting the formula. So far it seems to be working as we came away impressed with the updated and much less expensive RC8R ($16,499) during the 2011 KTM RC8R First Ride. Could this finally be KTM’s year to become the top Twin?


Last but not least is Yamaha and its crossplane-equipped YZF-R1. Similar to the GSX-R, the R1 is now in its third year since a major overhaul in ‘09 and hasn’t seen any updates aside from colors and the annual increase in price ($13,590). Although it’s had considerable success in the form of World Superbike title and AMA Superbike titles the R1 has always struggled in our tests. Will Yamaha prove its might in stock trim and turn things around this time? Climb on and lets see how it all shakes down.


Having utilized northern California’s fabulous Thunderhill Raceway for the last two years we wanted to shake things up so we headed to Southern California’s newest road course, Chuckwalla Valley Raceway. As opposed to other circuits Chuckwalla is all about cornering and momentum. Here you won’t find any long straight-aways or funky chicanes. Just a near constant mix of flowing mixed speed corners that maximize time spent on the edge of the tires. And a big shake-up in the running order is just what we got!
 
Speaking of tires, while the standard street rubber nowadays is better than ever, we needed to push these bikes near the limit of outright performance. So to reduce the likelihood of shiny plastic sliding against tarmac, Michelin stepped in as the Official Tire of Superbike Smackdown VIII Track with its latest Michelin Power One DOT-labeled treaded race tire as tested in the Michelin Power One Race Tire Review. Introduced in ’09 and updated continually, the Power One’s feature a multi-compound design that allowed us to achieve consistent footpeg grinding lean angle.


Flying around the track at the helm of motorcycles that pump out upwards of 150 horsepower to the back tire is no walk in the park. Accordingly, a high-caliber test crew was assembled highlighted by veteran AMA racer Steve Rapp. Having ridden everything from the full-on, real deal AMA Superbikes of the past to Harley-Davidsons in the newly formed Vance & Hines XR1200 Series, Rapp’s experience is invaluable. Also lending a throttle hand were AFM racers Michael Earnest, Corey Neuer, Chris Siglin, as well as do-it-all test rider Frankie Garcia and Contributing Editor Steve Atlas. Lastly, boss-man Ken Hutchison, and I represented the in-house MotoUSA crew. Welcome to the eighth annual 2011 Superbike Smackdown VIII Track shootout!
READ MORE - 2011 Superbike Smackdown VIII Track

MotoGP: Technology Worth Boring Racing?

Readers who have followed MotoUSA within the last week and caught the opening act of this multi-part feature on the state of MotoGP and its 2012 rules package know exactly where I stand on the issue ( MotoGP Editorial: Can 1000cc Save the Day?). A couple thousand words spent venting about the topic surely saw to that. The new rules are sadly a case of too little too late. Simply going back to 1000cc engines, with the current heightened state of electronic aids is going to do little more than drop lap times. The Grand Prix racing commission is skirting the real issue and trying to sell the idea that an additional 200cc will be the path to good racing as a remedy to the criticism leveled by an ever-mounting number of industry insiders and fans alike, who are restless by the lack of exciting racing on the track. The sub-20 rider grids and racing that’s starting to look like the Macy’s Day Parade… Even the most die-hard fans will open their eyes.

Anyone who thinks the solution to this problem, and the magical path to added excitement, is merely increasing today’s 800s by 200cc, well... They should contact me immediately for an incredible offer from a Nigerian business associate of mine (but act now as this life-changing opportunity will not last long!). In fact, I think some of the higher ranking officials in MotoGP’s inner rule-making fraternity are already some of his best clients.

I find it perplexing that an extra 200cc is somehow going to overpower all the expensive electronic aids that are keeping both wheels in-line 99.9% of the time on the 800s. Yet it seems the GP brain trust fully believes that bikes will, overnight, again be a handful to ride, spinning and sliding into and out of every corner. In short a return to the glory days of 500cc GP two-strokes, where only the very best of the best will be able to master these beasts and at the same time produce close racing, with 10-rider groups swapping the lead right to the checkered flag.


Lorenzo on the start grid  awaiting his meet his GP history - Sepang 2010
MotoGP remains the habitat for road racing elite, but shrinking grids have been the hallmark of the 800 era.
In today’s electronic era the new 1000s are simply going to be faster 800s. So while we will see lap records broken, once the teams have time to get everything dialed in, I doubt we will see much else (except more broken bones, as the added speed will likely equate to even bigger crashes when they do happen). But the reality is that setting new lap records won’t appear much different from your living room couch. Think about it for a second: Even if the existing lap records are blown out of the water by a massive amount, we’re talking upwards of two seconds a lap (huge by today’s standards and also very unlikely), the naked eye is going to perceive little-to-no change on television, or even in-person at the track.

This is because spread out over an entire lap, two seconds breaks down to mere tenths in any one visible section, making the difference between the 800s and 1000s almost impossible to notice. As such, it would appear the 17-rider parade may continue (unless the new ‘claiming rule teams’ idea takes off, but that discussion will have to wait until the next installment).

In fact, I happened upon a recent video on the internet of Sir Valentino Rossi himself testing Ducati’s new 1000cc Desmosedici GP12 at Mugello. Unfortunately, with the exception of a couple stylish wheelies, and the few seconds where the cameraman shook the camera to try and artificially produce the effect of instability, the new Italian GP stallion looked very, well... un-stallion-like; both wheels remained nicely in-line almost the entire time. I wonder what happened to those 120 mph two-wheel drifts that they promised? If Ducati couldn’t find enough footage to fill a 30-second ‘highlight’ reel with action-packed clips after a full day of testing, I fear GP fans may really be in trouble.

As I continued to explore the many benefits of the amazing world wide web (I’ve been looking for weeks now and I still haven’t found the end), I happened to stumble upon a similar video of one Mr. Casey Stoner testing the ‘new’ Honda 1000. This short clip even included a quick blurb from the ‘07 world champ on his initial impressions of the 2012 Honda, where he said it, “feels good to be back on a 1000, to feel that power again. Even in the upper gears where the 800 ran out (of acceleration) the 1000 keeps on building (speed). It was nice to feel it accelerating hard and sliding again.”

With its advanced electronics  power engine and friendly chassis its no wonder why the S1000RR is the best sportbike of 10.
MotoGP electronic technology may have trickled down to enhance production sportbike engineering, but is it taking all the fun out of professional racing?
Wait. Hold on. Could my entire argument be completely wrong? Did he say the magic "sliding" word? Was simply adding 200cc the answer to tire-smoking glory and edge-of-your-seat action? Several action clips of him riding the new Honda followed, of which I had a rather close look -- over and over and over again. And either I'm legally blind, or this “sliding” Stoner speaks of may just be a tad bit exaggerated. I guess even world-champion GP riders still speak in the international language of bench-racing from time to time.

The flip side to this argument is that these same GP electronic developments are directly responsible for the latest major advancements in sportbike technology, already seen on several of the recent liter-bikes. Say hello to the “trickle-down effect” at its finest. MotoGP-derived may be overused by today’s legions of two-wheel PR men, who hope to implant into a consumer’s grey matter the belief that their motorcycle is even remotely linked to the multi-million-dollar machines ridden by their GP heroes. But while cynics may be skeptical of these claims, in the case of electronics the latest crop of sportbikes prove there’s quite a bit of truth to the argument.

The irony of it all is that just when a good bit of cutting-edge MotoGP tech trickles down to road bikes in a timely manner, it turns out to also be responsible for making the racing from which it came progressively less and less exciting for the fans to watch. And these are the same fans who the manufacturers are trying to persuade into buying the new-and-improved road bikes, so they then have the money to fund future racing, which will in turn help the development of tomorrow’s street bikes... (confused yet, because I am). Quite the vicious circle, eh?

A recovering Jorge Lorenzo pays a visit to Indonesia to promote a new sponsor.
The popularity of racing helps fuel interest in the sport and sales in the showroom floor. Making the product on the track entertaining should be the highest priority.
The speed at which the technology wheel has been turning is extraordinary. Less than a decade after these electronic rider-aids first hit the scene in Grand Prix racing, showroom-stock bikes are coming equipped with multi-stage traction and wheelie control straight from the factory. These systems are now advanced enough to employ wheel-speed and lean-angle sensors, accelerometers, loads of engine and throttle position read-outs, and in some cases even gyros, all working in conjunction with each other to detect when the rear wheel slides, and in some cases even predict future losses in traction. This is all done with the aim of maximizing corner-exit drivability and reducing the amount of crashes when pushed closer and closer to its limits.

These systems have been an option on Ducati’s 1198 for several years now, while coming standard starting last year on the higher-end BMW S1000RR and Aprilia’s RSV4R. And for 2011, we now see the first Japanese bike get a true TC and wheelie control system in the form of Kawasaki’s all-new ZX-10R. In fact, for this year Aprilia has released a factory-option Launch Control (LC) system on its flagship RSV4 sportbike. (They must have also recently hired a skinny little man with coke-bottle glasses and a pocket protector that says NASA on it, because who else would have called the system ‘launch control?’) These are systems so advanced that Superbike teams of a mere five years ago would have been green with envy and happily paid tens of thousands of dollars for them. That was the beginning of the TC era in Superbikes and everyone was in a mad scramble to get a leg up on the competition.

In my opinion, what this technology has done for the street world is a great thing. How can one fault a system that allows a wider variety of riders the ability to experience the thrills that these amazing motorcycles are capable of with an ever-growing safety net? And if riders don’t like the electronic aides, just press a button and turn the entire system off. This is yet another prime example of how quickly racing can advance riding for the general public. But when some of these developments come at the cost of the entertainment produced by racing itself, then we have to reevaluate the situation.

Jorge Lorenzo  #99  and Dani Pedrosa  #26  battled for the lead in both the original race as well as the restart at the Sachsenring circuit.
After weighing the pros and cons, technological regression may still be the only answer to level the playing field.
The bottom line is without exciting racing the fans will stop showing up and watching it on TV, or supporting those companies involved in the sport. And without the fans and their support (i.e. money), motorcycle racing will lose even more ground. This is why when considering the options that either (a) the series intervenes and implements regulations with a slight degree of technological regression or (b) that there could soon be no racing at all, then I think the decision is pretty simple. It is time for the FIM to step in and make some hard decisions in the name of better racing...

But that's not all, oh no. Be sure to keep tuned-in to these pages for the third and (probably) final installment of this MotoGP editorial. We will take a look at what exactly these new “claiming rule” teams are all about, as well as detailing what teams, and possibly even what riders, will be using one of these hybrid prototype/production-based bikes (by the time you read this the FIM should have already announced the final rules and confirmed teams for the 2012 season). Not to mention the elephant in the room: Was this rule put in place to truly enhance the sport of MotoGP, or is it simply a last ditch way for series organizer Dorna to ensure they stay above the 17 full-time rider minimum mandated by the FIM? Considering the fact that if they are unable to meet this requirement they could face extreme intervention or possibly even lose the rights to the series and its promotion completely, the Spanish media giant has an awful lot riding on this new rule. But was it the right one?
READ MORE - MotoGP: Technology Worth Boring Racing?

Motorcycle

A 1954 Triumph T110 650 cc motorcycle
A Ural motorcycle with sidecar
A motorcycle (also called a motorbike, bike, or cycle) is a single-track,[1] two-wheeled[2] motor vehicle. Motorcycles vary considerably depending on the task for which they are designed, such as long distance travel, navigating congested urban traffic, cruising, sport and racing, or off-road conditions.
Motorcycles are one of the most affordable forms of motorised transport in many parts of the world and, for most of the world's population, they are also the most common type of motor vehicle.[3][4][5] There are around 200 million motorcycles (including mopeds, motor scooters and other powered two and three-wheelers) in use worldwide,[6] or about 33 motorcycles per 1000 people. This compares to around 590 million cars, or about 91 per 1000 people. Most of the motorcycles, 58%, are in the developing countries of Asia—Southern and Eastern Asia, and the Asia Pacific countries, excluding Japan—while 33% of the cars (195 million) are concentrated in the United States and Japan. As of 2002, India with an estimated 37 million motorcycles/mopeds was home to the largest number of motorised two wheelers in the world. China came a close second with 34 million motorcycles/mopeds.[7][8]

Contents

[hide]

[edit] History

Replica of the Daimler-Maybach Petroleum Reitwagen.
The first internal combustion, petroleum fueled motorcycle was the Petroleum Reitwagen. It was designed and built by the German inventors Gottlieb Daimler and Wilhelm Maybach in Bad Cannstatt, Germany in 1885.[9] This vehicle was unlike either the safety bicycles or the boneshaker bicycles of the era in that it had zero degrees of steering axis angle and no fork offset, and thus did not use the principles of bicycle and motorcycle dynamics developed nearly 70 years earlier. Instead, it relied on two outrigger wheels to remain upright while turning.[10] The inventors called their invention the Reitwagen ("riding car"). It was designed as an expedient testbed for their new engine, rather than a true prototype vehicle.[11][12] Many authorities who exclude steam powered, electric or diesel two-wheelers from the definition of a motorcycle, credit the Daimler Reitwagen as the world's first motorcycle.[13][14][15]
If a two-wheeled vehicle with steam propulsion is considered a motorcycle, then the first was the French Michaux-Perreaux steam velocipede of 1868.[11][12] This was followed by the American Roper steam velocipede of 1869, built by Sylvester H. Roper Roxbury, Massachusetts.[11][12] Roper demonstrated his machine at fairs and circuses in the eastern U.S. in 1867,[9] and built a total of 10 examples.[15]
In 1894, Hildebrand & Wolfmüller became the first series production motorcycle, and the first to be called a motorcycle (German: Motorrad).[11][12][15][16] In the early period of motorcycle history, many producers of bicycles adapted their designs to accommodate the new internal combustion engine. As the engines became more powerful and designs outgrew the bicycle origins, the number of motorcycle producers increased.
Until World War I, the largest motorcycle manufacturer in the world was Indian,[17][18] producing over 20,000 bikes per year.[19] By 1920, this honour went to Harley-Davidson,[citation needed] with their motorcycles being sold by dealers in 67 countries.[20][21] By the late 1920s or early 1930s, DKW took over as the largest manufacturer.[22][23][24]
After World War II, the BSA Group became the largest producer of motorcycles in the world, producing up to 75,000 bikes per year in the 1950s.[citation needed] The German company NSU held the position of largest manufacturer from 1955 until the 1970s.[citation needed]
NSU Sportmax streamlined motorcycle, 250 cc class winner of the 1955 Grand Prix season
In the 1950s, streamlining began to play an increasing part in the development of racing motorcycles and the "dustbin fairing" held out the possibility of radical changes to motorcycle design. NSU and Moto Guzzi were in the vanguard of this development, both producing very radical designs well ahead of their time.[25] NSU produced the most advanced design, but after the deaths of four NSU riders in the 1954–1956 seasons, they abandoned further development and quit Grand Prix motorcycle racing.[26] Moto Guzzi produced competitive race machines, and by 1957 nearly all the Grand Prix races were being won by streamlined machines.[citation needed] The following year, 1958, full enclosure fairings were banned from racing by the FIM in the light of the safety concerns.
From the 1960s through the 1990s, small two-stroke motorcycles were popular worldwide, partly as a result of East German Walter Kaaden's engine work in the 1950s.[27]
Today, the motorcycle industry is mainly dominated by Japanese companies such as Honda, Kawasaki, Suzuki, and Yamaha, although Harley-Davidson and BMW continue to be popular and supply considerable markets. Other major manufacturers include Piaggio group of Italy, KTM, Triumph and Ducati.
In addition to the large capacity motorcycles, there is a large market in smaller capacity (less than 300 cc) motorcycles, mostly concentrated in Asian and African countries. An example is the 1958 Honda Super Cub, which went on to become the biggest selling vehicle of all time, with its 60 millionth unit produced in April 2008.[28] Today, this area is dominated by mostly Indian companies with Hero Honda emerging as the world's largest manufacturer of two wheelers. Other major producers are Bajaj and TVS Motors.[29] For example, its Splendor model has sold more than 8.5 million to date.[30]

[edit] Technical aspects

A Suzuki GS500 with a clearly visible frame (painted silver).

[edit] Construction

Motorcycle construction is the engineering, manufacturing, and assembly of components and systems for a motorcycle which results in the performance, cost, and aesthetics desired by the designer. With some exceptions, construction of modern mass-produced motorcycles has standardised on a steel or aluminium frame, telescopic forks holding the front wheel, and disc brakes. Some other body parts, designed for either aesthetic or performance reasons may be added. A petrol powered engine typically consisting of between one and four cylinders (and less commonly, up to eight cylinders) coupled to a manual five- or six-speed sequential transmission drives the swingarm-mounted rear wheel by a chain, driveshaft or belt.

[edit] Fuel economy

Motorcycle fuel economy varies greatly with engine displacement and riding style[31] ranging from a low of 29 mpg-US (8.1 L/100 km; 35 mpg-imp) reported by a Honda VTR1000F rider,[32] to 107 mpg-US (2.20 L/100 km; 129 mpg-imp) reported for the Verucci Nitro 50 cc Scooter.[33] A specially designed Matzu Matsuzawa Honda XL125 achieved 470 mpg-US (0.50 L/100 km; 560 mpg-imp) "on real highways - in real conditions."[34] Due to low engine displacements (100 cc–200 cc), and high power-to-mass ratios, motorcycles offer good fuel economy. Under conditions of fuel scarcity like 1950s Britain and modern developing nations, motorcycles claim large shares of the vehicle market.

[edit] Electric motorcycles

Very high fuel economy equivalents can be derived by electric motorcycles. Electric motorcycles are nearly silent, zero-emission electric motor-driven vehicles. Operating range and top speed suffer because of limitations of battery technology.[citation needed] Fuel cells and petroleum-electric hybrids are also under development to extend the range and improve performance of the electric motors.

[edit] Dynamics

Racing motorcycles leaning in a turn.
Different types of motorcycles have different dynamics and these play a role in how a motorcycle performs in given conditions. For example, one with a longer wheelbase provides the feeling of more stability by responding less to disturbances.[35] Motorcycle tyres have a large influence over handling.
Motorcycles must be leaned in order to make turns. This lean is induced by the method known as countersteering, in which the rider momentarily steers the handlebars in the direction opposite of the desired turn. Because it is counter-intuitive this practice is often very confusing to novices—and even to many experienced motorcyclists.[36]
Short wheelbase motorcycles, such as sport bikes, can generate enough torque at the rear wheel, and enough stopping force at the front wheel, to lift the opposite wheel off the road. These actions, if performed on purpose, are known as wheelies and stoppies respectively. If carried past the point of recovery the resulting upset is known as an "endo" (short for "end-over-end"), or "looping" the vehicle.

[edit] Accessories

Various features and accessories may be attached to a motorcycle either as OEM (factory-fitted) or after-market. Such accessories are selected by the owner to enhance the motorcycle's appearance, safety, performance, or comfort, and may include anything from mobile electronics to sidecars and trailers.

[edit] Social aspects

[edit] Popularity

Number of motorcycles vs number of cars by country. Size of pie indicates population. 2002 estimates.[7][8]
Millions of cars (light blue) and motorcycles (dark blue) in the top 20 countries with the most motorcycles. Population in red. 2002 estimates.[7][8]
Motorbikes are the primary form of transportation in Vietnam.
In numerous cultures, motorcycles are the primary means of motorised transport. According to the Taiwanese government, for example, "the number of automobiles per ten thousand population is around 2,500, and the number of motorcycles is about 5,000."[37] In places such as Vietnam, motorised traffic consist of mostly motorbikes[4] due to a lack of public transport and low income levels that put automobiles out of reach for many.[3]
The four largest motorcycle markets in the world are all in Asia: China, India, Indonesia, and Vietnam.[3] The motorcycle is also popular in Brazil's frontier towns.[5] Amid the global economic downturn of 2008, the motorcycle market grew by 6.5%.[38]
Recent years have seen an increase in the popularity of motorcycles elsewhere. In the USA, registrations increased by 51% between 2000 and 2005.[39] This is mainly attributed to increasing fuel prices and urban congestion.[40] A Consumer Reports subscribers' survey of mainly United States motorcycle and scooter owners reported that they rode an average of only 1,000 miles (1,600 km) per year, 82% for recreation and 38% for commuting.[41] Americans put 10,000–12,000 miles (16,000–19,000 km) per year on their cars and light trucks.[42]

[edit] Subcultures

Sunbeam motorcycle owners rally, 2008.
A Hells Angels wall mural in Southampton, UK
Around the world, motorcycles have historically been associated with subcultures. Some of these subcultures have been loose-knit social groups such as the cafe racers of 1950s Britain, and the Mods and Rockers of the 1960s. A few are believed to be criminal gangs. Books about motorcycle subcultures include Hunter S. Thompson's Hells Angels (1966), Lee Gutkind's Bike Fever (1974), and Daniel R. Wolf's The Rebels (1991).
Social motorcyclist organisations are popular and are sometimes organised geographically, focus on individual makes, or even specific models. Example motorcycle clubs include: American Motorcyclist Association, Harley Owners Group and BMW MOA. Some organisations hold large international motorcycle rallies in different parts of the world that are attended by many thousands of riders.
Whereas many social motorcycle organisations raise money for charities through organised events and rides, some other motorcycle organisations exist only for the direct benefit of others. Bikers Against Child Abuse (BACA) is one example. BACA assigns members to individual children to help them through difficult situations, or even stay with the child if the child is alone or frightened.[43]
In recent decades, motorcyclists have formed political lobbying organisations in order to influence legislators to introduce motorcycle-friendly legislation. One of the oldest such organisations, the British Motorcycle Action Group, was founded in 1973 specifically in response to helmet compulsion, introduced without public consultation.[44] In addition, the British Motorcyclists Federation (BMF), originally founded in 1960 as a reaction to the public perception of motorcyclists as leather-jacketed hooligans, has itself moved into political lobbying. Likewise, the U.S. has ABATE, which, like most such organisations, also works to improve motorcycle safety, as well as running the usual charity fund-raising events and rallies, often for motorcycle-related political interests.[45]
At the other end of the spectrum from the charitable organisations and the motorcycle rights activists are the Outlaw Motorcycle Gangs. These are defined by the Provincial Court of Manitoba as: "Any group of motorcycle enthusiasts who have voluntarily made a commitment to band together and abide by their organisations' rigorous rules enforced by violence, who engage in activities that bring them and their club into serious conflict with society and the law".[46] The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and Criminal Intelligence Service Canada have designated four MCs as Outlaw Motorcycle Gangs (OMGs), which are the Pagans, Hells Angels, Outlaws MC, and Bandidos,[47][48] known as the "Big Four".[49]

[edit] Mobility

A couple ride on a motorcycle in Udaipur, India. Annual sales of motorcycles in India are expected to exceed 10 million by 2010.[50]
While people choose to ride motorcycles for various reasons, those reasons are increasingly practical, with riders opting for a powered two-wheeler as a cost-efficient alternative to infrequent and expensive public transport systems, or as a means of avoiding or reducing the effects of urban congestion.[51] In places where it is permitted, lane splitting, also known as filtering, allows motorcycles to use the space between vehicles to move through stationary or slow traffic.[52]
In the UK, motorcycles are exempt from the £8 per day London congestion charge other vehicles must pay to enter the city during the day. Motorcycles are also exempt from toll charges at some river crossings, such as the Severn Bridge, Dartford Crossing, and Mersey Tunnels. Some cities, such as Bristol, allow motorcycles to use bus lanes and provide dedicated free parking. In the United States, those states that have high-occupancy vehicle lanes also allow for motorcycle travel in them. Other countries have similar policies.
In New Zealand motorcycle riders are not required to pay for parking that is controlled by a barrier arm;[53] the arm does not occupy the entire width of the lane, and the motorcyclist simply rides around it.[54] Many car parks controlled in this way supply special areas for motorcycles to park, so as not to unnecessarily consume spaces.
In many cities that have serious parking challenges for cars, such as San Francisco, US and Melbourne, Australia, motorcycles are generally permitted to park on the sidewalk, rather than occupy a space on the street which might otherwise be used by a car.[citation needed]

[edit] Safety

Motorcycles have a higher rate of fatal accidents than automobiles or trucks and buses. United States Department of Transportation data for 2005 from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System show that for passenger cars, 18.62 fatal crashes occur per 100,000 registered vehicles. For motorcycles this figure is higher at 75.19 per 100,000 registered vehicles – four times higher than for cars.[55] The same data shows that 1.56 fatalities occur per 100 million vehicle miles travelled for passenger cars, whereas for motorcycles the figure is 43.47 – 28 times higher than for cars (37 times more deaths per mile travelled in 2007).[56] Furthermore for motorcycles the accident rates have increased significantly since the end of the 1990s, while the rates have dropped for passenger cars.
Wearing a motorcycle helmet reduces the chances of death or injury in a motorcycle crash
The two major causes of motorcycle accidents in the United States are: motorists pulling out or turning in front of motorcyclists and violating their rights-of-way and motorcyclists running wide through turns. The former is sometimes called a SMIDSY, an acronym formed from the motorists' common response of "Sorry mate, I didn't see you".[57] The latter is more commonly caused by operating a motorcycle while intoxicated.[58] Motorcyclists can anticipate and avoid some of these crashes with proper training, increasing their conspicuousness to other traffic, and separating alcohol and riding.
The United Kingdom has several organisations which are dedicated to improving motorcycle safety by providing advanced rider training over and above what is necessary to pass the basic motorcycle test. These include the Institute of Advanced Motorists (IAM) and the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents (RoSPA). Along with increased personal safety, riders with these advanced qualifications often benefit from reduced insurance costs.
In South Africa, the Think Bike campaign is dedicated to increasing both motorcycle safety and the awareness of motorcycles on the country's roads. The campaign, while strongest in the Gauteng province, has representation in Western Cape, KwaZulu Natal and the Free State. It has dozens of trained marshals available for various events such as cycle races and is deeply involved in numerous other projects such as the annual Motorcycle Toy Run.[59]
An MSF rider course for novices
Motorcycle Safety Education is offered throughout the United States by organisations ranging from state agencies to non-profit organisations to corporations. Most states use the courses designed by the Motorcycle Safety Foundation (MSF), while Oregon and Idaho developed their own. All of the training programs include a Basic Rider Course, an Intermediate Rider Course and an Advanced Rider Course.
In the UK (except Northern Ireland) and some Australian jurisdictions, such as Victoria, New South Wales,[60] the Australian Capital Territory,[61] Tasmania[62] and the Northern Territory,[63] it is compulsory to undertake a rider training course before being issued a Learners Licence.
In Canada, motorcycle rider training is compulsory in Quebec and Manitoba only, but all provinces and territories have Graduated Licensing programs which place restrictions on new drivers until they have gained experience. Eligibility for a full motorcycle licence or endorsement for completing a Motorcycle Safety course varies by province. The Canada Safety Council, a non-profit safety organisation, offers the Gearing Up program across Canada and is endorsed by the Motorcycle and Moped Industry Council.[64] Training course graduates may qualify for reduced insurance premiums.

[edit] Types

A boulevard cruiser (front) and a sportbike (background)
French police motorcyclist
There are three major types of motorcycle: street, off-road, and dual purpose. Within these types, there are many different sub-types of motorcycles for many different purposes.
Street bikes include cruisers, sportbikes, scooters and mopeds, and many other types. Off-road motorcycles include many types designed for dirt-oriented racing classes such as motocross and are not street legal in most areas. Dual purpose machines like the dual-sport style are made to go off-road but include features to make them legal and comfortable on the street as well.
Each configuration offers either specialised advantage or broad capability, and each design creates a different riding posture.

[edit] Motorcycle rider postures

The motorcyclist's riding position depends on rider body-geometry (anthropometry) combined with the geometry of the motorcycle itself. These factors create a set of three basic postures.[65]
  • Sport — the rider leans forwards into the wind and the weight of the upper torso is supported by the riders arms (at low speed) and air pressure (at high speed, e.g., above 50 mph (80 km/h). The footpegs are below the rider or to the rear. The reduced frontal area cuts wind resistance and allow higher speeds. At low-speed this position throws the weight of the rider onto the arms, and this can be tiring to the rider's wrists. The sports position makes it more difficult for the rider to look around and foot through traffic.
  • Standard — the rider sits upright or leans forwards slightly. The feet are below the rider. These are motorcycles that are not specialised to one task, but may not excel in one area either.[66] The standard posture is used with touring and commuting as well as dirt and dual-sport bikes, and is may offer advantages for beginners.[67] The rider enjoys the benefits of freedom of head movement, good visibility in all directions, and easier use of the feet while moving through stationary traffic.
  • Cruiser — the rider sits at a lower seat height with the upper torso upright or leaning slightly rearwards. Legs are extended forwards, sometimes out of reach of the regular controls on cruiser pegs. The low seat heights can be a consideration for new or short riders. Handlebars tend to be high, and wide. Harley-Davidsons are exemplars of this style.[68] The emphasis is on comfort, while compromising cornering ability because of low ground clearance and the greater likelihood of scraping foot pegs, floor boards, or other parts if turns are taken at the speeds other types of motorcycles can do.[69][70]
Factors of a motorcycle's ergonomic geometry that determine the seating posture include the height, angle and location of footpegs, seat and handlebars. Factors in a rider's physical geometry that contribute to seating posture include torso, arm, thigh and leg length, and overall rider height.

[edit] Legal definitions and restrictions

A motorcycle is broadly defined by law in most countries for the purposes of registration, taxation and rider licensing as a powered two-wheel motor vehicle. Most countries distinguish between mopeds of 49 cc and the more powerful, larger, vehicles (scooters do not count as a separate category). Many jurisdictions include some forms of three-wheelers as motorcycles.

[edit] Environmental impact

In 2007 and 2008, motorcycles and scooters, due to good fuel efficiency, attracted interest in the United States from environmentalists and those affected by increased fuel prices.[71][72] Piaggio Group Americas supported this interest with the launch of a "Vespanomics" website and platform, citing lower per-mile carbon emissions of 0.4 lb/mile (113 g/km) less than the average car, a 65% reduction, and better fuel economy.[73]
Other sources, however, claim that while motorcycles produce much less pollution in terms of greenhouse gases, a motorcycle can in some cases emit 10–20 times the quantity of nitrogen oxides (NOx) when compared to the NOx emissions of a car.[71][74] This is because many motorcycles lack a catalytic converter to reduce NOx emissions, and while catalytic converters have been used in cars long enough that they are now commonplace, they are a relatively new technology in motorcycles.[71] Many newer motorcycles (such as later models of the Yamaha R1 and Suzuki GSXR1000, as well as most BMWs which have included catalytic converers since the 1990s) now have factory fitted catalytic converters. Along with other technologies that have taken longer to appear in motorcycles (e.g. fuel injection, anti-lock brake systems),[citation needed] catalytic converters are becoming increasingly commonplace.
United States Environmental Protection Agency 2007 certification result reports for all vehicles versus on highway motorcycles (which also includes scooters),[75] the average certified emissions level for 12,327 vehicles tested was 0.734. The average "Nox+Co End-Of-Useful-Life-Emissions" for 3,863 motorcycles tested was 0.8531, for a difference of about 16%, not the claimed 10X factor. Likewise, if one looks at how many of the 2007 motorcycles tested were also catalytic equipped, 54% of them, 2,092, were equipped with a catalytic converter.

[edit] United States emissions limits

The following table shows maximum acceptable legal emissions of the combination of hydrocarbon and nitrous oxides, as well as carbon monoxide, for new Class III motorcycles (280 cc or larger displacement) sold in the United States.[76]
Tier Model year HC+NOx (g/km) CO (g/km)
Tier 1 2006–2009 1.4 12.0
Tier 2 2010 and later 0.8 12.0
The maximum acceptable legal emissions of hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide for new Class I and II motorcycles (50 cc–169 cc and 170 cc–279 cc respectively) sold in the United States are as follows:[76]
Model year HC (g/km) CO (g/km)
2006 and later 1.0 12.0

[edit] Europe

European emission standards for motorcycles are similar to those for cars. New motorcycles must meet Euro III standards,[77] while cars must meet Euro V standards. Therefore, the difference in total pollution between motorcycles and cars that pass European emission standards would be small, certainly much smaller than the 10X factor claimed by the referenced LA Times article. Motorcycle emissions controls are being updated and it has been proposed to update to Euro IV in 2012 and Euro V in 2015[78]

[edit] See also

[edit] References

  1. ^ Foale, Tony (2006). Motorcycle Handling and Chassis Design. Tony Foale Designs. pp. 4–1. ISBN 978-84-933286-3-4.
  2. ^ Cossalter, Vittore (2006). Motorcycle Dynamics. Lulu. ISBN 978-1-4303-0861-4.
  3. ^ a b c Hiroko Nakata (8 October 2008). "Motorcycle makers battle it out in Vietnam". Japan Times. Retrieved 11 March 2009.
  4. ^ a b Patti McCracken (1 October 2008). "Vietnam eats, sleeps, and dreams on motorbikes". The Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved 11 March 2009.
  5. ^ a b Alexei Barrionuevo (3 November 2008). "That Roar in the Jungle Is 15,000 Motorbikes". The New York Times. Retrieved 11 March 2009.
  6. ^ Shuhei(Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd., JPN), Adachi (2006). "Fuel Cell Powered Motorcycles". Journal of the Society of Automotive Engineers of Japan 60 (1): 90–93. ISSN 0385-7298.
  7. ^ a b c "Passenger Cars; Map No. 31". Worldmapper: The world as you've never seen it before. 2002. See Technical notes for this data
  8. ^ a b c "Mopeds And Motorcycles Map No. 32". Worldmapper: The world as you've never seen it before. 2002. See data files for the statistics
  9. ^ a b "The Past—1800s: First motorcycle". The History and Future of Motorcycles and motorcycling—From 1885 to the Future, Total Motorcycle Website. Retrieved 28 June 2007.
  10. ^ Lienhard, John H. (2005). Inventing Modern: Growing Up with X-Rays, Skyscrapers, and Tailfins. Oxford University Press US. pp. 120–121. ISBN 0195189515.
  11. ^ a b c d Setright, L.J.K. (1979). The Guinness book of motorcycling facts and feats. Guinness Superlatives. pp. 8–18. ISBN 0851122000, 9780851122007.
  12. ^ a b c d Falco, Charles M.; Guggenheim Museum Staff (1998). "Issues in the Evolution of the Motorcycle". In Krens, Thomas; Drutt, Matthew. The Art of the Motorcycle. Harry N. Abrams. pp. 24–31. ISBN 0892072075.
  13. ^ "motorcycle, n.". Oxford English Dictionary Online. Oxford University Press. March 2009. "1. A two-wheeled motor-driven road vehicle, resembling a bicycle but powered by an internal-combustion engine; (now) spec. one with an engine capacity, top speed, or weight greater than that of a moped."
  14. ^ Long, Tony (30 August 2007). "Aug. 30, 1885: Daimler Gives World First 'True' Motorcycle". Wired (magazine). ISSN 1059-1028.
  15. ^ a b c Kresnak, Bill (2008). Motorcycling for Dummies. Hoboken, New Jersey: For Dummies, Wiley Publishing. ISBN 0470245875
  16. ^ "Brief History of the Marque: Hildebrand & Wolfmuller". Hildebrand & Wolfmuller Motorad, European Motorcycle Universe. Retrieved 28 June 2007.
  17. ^ Walker, Mick (2006). Motorcycle: Evolution, Design, Passion. JHU Press. ISBN 0801885302, 9780801885303.
  18. ^ George Hendee. The AMA Motorcycle Hall of Fame Museum. Retrieved 8 August 2009.
  19. ^ Youngblood, Ed (June 2001). "The Rise and Fall". American Motorcyclist (American Motorcyclist Assoc) 55 (6).
  20. ^ Prashad, Sharda (16 April 2006). "HOG WILD; U of T professor Brendan Calder is one of the legions of baby boomers who have helped to ensure the success of the Harley- Davidson brand name, not to mention its bottom line.". Toronto Star (Toronto, Ont.): p. A.16.
  21. ^ Cato, Jeremy (8 August 2003). "Harley-Davidson at 100". The Vancouver Sun (Vancouver, B.C.): p. E.1.Fro.
  22. ^ Vance, Bill (24 April 2009). "Motoring Memories: DKW/Auto Union, 1928 - 1966". Canadian Driver.
  23. ^ de Cet, Mirco (2002). The illustrated directory of motorcycles. MotorBooks/MBI Publishing Company. p. 128. ISBN 0760314179, 9780760314173.
  24. ^ Walker, Mick (1999). Mick Walker's German Racing Motorcycles. Redline Books. p. 61. ISBN 0953131122, 9780953131129.
  25. ^ Willoughby, Vic (1982). Exotic Motorcycles. London: Osprey Publishing, Ltd. ISBN 0850453224.
  26. ^ "Rupert Hollaus". Motorsport Memorial. Retrieved 3 April 2008.
  27. ^ Ed Youngblood. "Motocross goes International, 1947 through 1965". The History of Motocross, Part Two, Motorcycle Hall of Fame Museum. Retrieved 29 June 2007.
  28. ^ Squatriglia, Chuck (23 May 2008). "Honda Sells Its 60 Millionth - Yes, Millionth - Super Cub". Autopia. Wired. Retrieved 28 January 2010.
  29. ^ O'Malley Greenburg, Zack (13 August 2007). "World's Cheapest Car". Forbes. Retrieved 28 January 2010.
  30. ^ "Hero Honda splendor sells more than 8.5 million units". indiacar.net. Retrieved 10 August 2008.
  31. ^ "Motorcycle Fuel Consumption & Real World Performance Guide". MFC Website. Retrieved 13 June 2008.
  32. ^ "Total Motorcycle Fuel Economy Guide". Total Motorcycle Website. Retrieved 14 August 2006.
  33. ^ "Verucci Gas Scooters". Gekgo Worldwide, www.gekgo.com. Retrieved 15 August 2006.
  34. ^ "Doing More with Less Energy". The Craig Vetter Fuel Economy Contests - 1980 through 1985. Retrieved 15 August 2006.
  35. ^ Gaetano, Cocco (2004). Motorcycle Design and Technology. Minneapolis: MotorBooks/MBI Publishing Company. pp. 34–35. ISBN 9780760319901. "So with the same disturbance, the rider with a longer wheelbase will feel less oscilating movement on the handlebars, and therefore, will have a perception of greater stability on the motorcycle."
  36. ^ Joel Fajans (July 2000). "Steering in bicycles and motorcycles" (PDF). American Journal of Physics, v. 68 (7): 654–59. Retrieved 4 August 2006.
  37. ^ Chung-Li. "Sustainable Development Indicators for Taiwan". Workshop on Sustainable Development Indicators. Retrieved 14 August 2006.[dead link]
  38. ^ Makiko Kitamura and Tetsuya Komatsu (3 March 2009). "Honda’s $140-a-Month Motorbikes Ease Pain of ‘Grim’ Car Market". Bloomberg. Retrieved 11 March 2009.
  39. ^ "Popularity of high-performance motorcycles helps push rider deaths to near-record high". Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. 11 September 2007. Retrieved 22 October 2008.
  40. ^ PRNewswire (19 May 2008). "Soaring Gas Prices Shine Money-Saving Spotlight on Motorcycles". Reuters. Retrieved 28 January 2010.
  41. ^ Travers, Jim (1 June 2010). "Survey: Motorcycle and scooter owners are very satisfied with their bikes". Consumer Reports. Retrieved 2010-08-02
  42. ^ Emission Facts: Greenhouse Gas Emissions from a Typical Passenger Vehicle. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Transportation and Air Quality. February 2005. Retrieved 2010-08-02
  43. ^ "About BACA". Bikers Against Child Abuse. Retrieved 10 October 2007.
  44. ^ "About MAG". MAG UK. Retrieved 10 October 2007.
  45. ^ Some other lobbying organisations are listed in Category:Motorcyclists organizations.
  46. ^ Organized Crime Fact Sheet- Public Safety Canada
  47. ^ FBI Safe Street Violent Crime Initiative - Report Fiscal Year 2000- FBI.org
  48. ^ 2004 Annual Report- Criminal Intelligence Service Canada, cisc.gc.ca
  49. ^ Motorcycle Gangs- Connecticut Gang Investigators Association
  50. ^ "Two Wheelers: Sales". Automobileindia.com. Retrieved 28 January 2010.
  51. ^ Bob Tomlins (September 1997). "Rider training in Europe The Views and the Needs of the Rider" (PDF). The Federation of European Motorcyclists. Retrieved 30 June 2007.
  52. ^ "All the info you need on lanesharing (lanesplitting)". www.WhyBike.com. Retrieved 28 June 2007.
  53. ^ "Drivers guide to Auckland City parking". City of Aukland. 2007. Archived from Parking the original on 1 July 2008. Retrieved 8 August 2008.
  54. ^ "Motorcycle parking in Wellington CBD". Kiwibiker.co.nz. Retrieved 28 January 2010.
  55. ^ "Traffic safety facts, 2008. Report no. DOT HS-811-159" (pdf). NHTSA's National Center for Statistics and Analysis. 2008. Retrieved 2010-09-15.
  56. ^ "The 'sorry mate I didn't see you' campaign". South Gloucestershire Council. Retrieved 21 May 2008.
  57. ^ Hurt, H.H., Ouellet, J.V. and Thom, D.R. (January 1981). "The Hurt Report". Technical Report, Volume 1, Traffic Safety Center, University of Southern California. Retrieved 16 May 2007.
  58. ^ "About Think Bike". Think Bike. Retrieved 21 March 2010.[dead link]
  59. ^ "Learner riders licence". Motorcycle Rider Training Scheme, Roads and Traffic Authority, NSW. Retrieved 16 May 2007.
  60. ^ "Learner Licence". Road Transport Information Management, www.rego.act.gov.au. Retrieved 16 May 2007.
  61. ^ "TAS Learner Licence". Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources, http://www.transport.tas.gov.au. Retrieved 13 June 2009.
  62. ^ "Motorcyclist Education Training And Licencing (METAL)". Northern Territory Department of Planning and Infrastructure, www.ipe.nt.gov.au. Retrieved 16 May 2007.
  63. ^ "MMIC Information". Motorcycle and Moped Industry Council. Retrieved 16 May 2007.
  64. ^ "A Three Dimensional Analysis of Riding Posture in Three Different Styles of Motorcycle" (PDF). Motorcycle Safety Foundation. March 2006. Retrieved 31 January 2008.
  65. ^ Duglin Kennedy, Shirley (2005). The Savvy Guide to Motorcycles. Indy Tech Publishing. p. 75. ISBN 0790613166, 9780790613161.
  66. ^ Stermer, Bill (2006). Streetbikes: Everything You Need to Know. MotorBooks/MBI Publishing Company. p. 16. ISBN 0760323623, 9780760323625.
  67. ^ Seeley, Alan (2004). The Motorcycle Book: Everything You Need to Know about Owning, Enjoying, and Maintaining Your Bike. MotorBooks/MBI Publishing Company. pp. 18–19. ISBN 0760317453, 9780760317457.
  68. ^ Stermer, Bill (2006). Streetbikes: Everything You Need to Know. MotorBooks/MBI Publishing Company. p. 10. ISBN 0760323623, 9780760323625.
  69. ^ Duglin Kennedy, Shirley (2005). The Savvy Guide to Motorcycles. Indy Tech Publishing. p. 71. ISBN 0790613166, 9780790613161.
  70. ^ a b c Susan Carpenter (11 June 2008). "Motorcycles and emissions: The surprising facts". LA Times. Retrieved 8 August 2008.
  71. ^ Judy Dahl (September 2007). "Baby, You Can Drive My Vespa". Madison Magazine. Archived from the original on 28 January 2010. Retrieved 8 August 2008.
  72. ^ "Vespanomics - Vespa Economics". Piaggio Group USA. Retrieved 8 February 2010.
  73. ^ Umbra Fisk (28 May 2003). "On motorcycles - Ask Umbra". Grist.
  74. ^ "Certified Highway Motorcycle Test Result Report Data (2007)". US EPA. 8 January 2008.
  75. ^ a b "EPA Emissions Regulations for 1978 and Later New Motorcycles, General Provisions". United States Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved on 1 June 2009.
  76. ^ Madson, Bart (15 February 2007). "Motorcycle Emissions Regs Examined". Motorcycle-USA.com. Retrieved 28 January 2010.
  77. ^ "EURO 5 Cycle Emissions Proposed for 2015". Dealernews.com. 8 December 2008. Retrieved 28 January 2010.

[edit] External links

READ MORE - Motorcycle